Pornteengirl.com

Looking through the site, it strikes me that the breast sizes listed with each girl are quite imprecise. I guess the main reason I may want to use this is if I'm doing a search for a girl I've seen on one site. If she isn't listed under her name, I might search for blondes who did a scene for AssTeenMouth with large breasts.

Small Medium and Large are quite difficult to define. I was watching Xenia earlier and in my view she has Medium breasts - but her profile says Small.



Riley Mae has similar sized breasts in my view but she is listed as Medium.



A few others seem a bit weird too - Jen Stefani is Small but Cameron Canada is Medium. Natasha Starr whose breasts are much bigger is also Medium.

A few mistakes can happen but I think the scale is quite limiting and makes mistakes easier. Breasts are obviously very important to anyone who uses a site like PTG. Maybe it's worth thinking about updating the Small Medium Large classification?

Some ideas for improvement:

- List bra size (where available), and do categories based on these sizes
- Add new categories, eg Tiny, Huge, or do a number scale from 1-5
- Include details on any enlargements/augmentations

Hi teengangbangrev,

yes you're absolutely correct

It's really a big mess i'm with you... but it's not a site problem... it's more a general problem...

Often you have"bad" pictures when a girl is "NEW" (bad angles, photoshop etc.)... and when the profile is created it's hard to maintain all details constant... because only a few people are administrative here... an we have a lot of profiles and less time

On the other site especially european/russian girls are often without agency or they go with an agency where you have no access to view the model profile...

Personally when i create a new model profile, i use the information i got from the agency profile... US girls model profiles are often very detailed when it comes to the measurements
And than i work with a list like this --> https://international.triangl.com/pages ... -underwear to define the boob size...

Otherwise i decide with my "experience" (yes i know that word sounds weird )

Implementing a more detailed system i guess can be a lot of work...

At the end poluxplop007 has to do this if he wants


PS:
Here is an actual example...

Vienna Black --> http://www.pornteengirl.com/model/vienna-black.html
When you look at her profile picture... imho her breats are looking "SMALL"
When you visit her model profile --> https://hussiemodels.com/portfolio-item ... rettyPhoto
her breasts are looking a little bit bigger (can be something between small - medium)... and when you now look at her measurements --> Chest: 34C
She has "MEDIUM" boobs
And here we have the problem... when you've seen only this profile picture... the one who creates the profiles adds "SMALL" and maybe another one who has more detailed pictures and infos adds "MEDIUM"

I'm ok with you too, but it is not so easy to put a border between small<->medium<->large without mensurement, and we don't have mensurement for most of girls, i think adding other criteria will complicate even more this border, it is like for hair color, it is often very complicated to put a border between red and brown, i could add chestnut between red and brown, but at this point we are going to tell me that she is rather brown than chestnut for example

Thanks both for responding. I agree it's really difficult to get this right and hope my message didn't seem too critical. I know any change like this requires HUGE effort to get right, and existing profiles probably won't adapt, but it's an obvious gap in this excellent site.

LilyRaderFAN wrote:Personally when i create a new model profile, i use the information i got from the agency profile... US girls model profiles are often very detailed when it comes to the measurements
And than i work with a list like this --> https://international.triangl.com/pages ... -underwear to define the boob size...

I really like this kind of approach - when this data is available, it seems like a great idea to use a set guide like this. Maybe if everyone submitting a profile used the same guide consistently it might help?

LilyRaderFAN wrote:Otherwise i decide with my "experience" (yes i know that word sounds weird )

I know exactly what you mean, we all use our own judgement. I'd probably consider the "would my hands be full" judgement - if no, Small, if yes, Medium, if overflowing, Big. But this isn't set, so I do like the approach you used with the bikini sizes.

poluxplop007 wrote:I'm ok with you too, but it is not so easy to put a border between small<->medium<->large without mensurement, and we don't have mensurement for most of girls, i think adding other criteria will complicate even more this border, it is like for hair color, it is often very complicated to put a border between red and brown, i could add chestnut between red and brown, but at this point we are going to tell me that she is rather brown than chestnut for example

Understand, and the difficulty is that this isn't an exact science. Her size can change during her career, at different times of her monthly cycle, etc. I do like the idea of using a set size guide like the one LilyRaderFAN used though where the data is available, it at least reduces the number of judgement calls the profile builders need to make.